BROWNNOSE
BOOTLICKER
The more info on this but is the only so far a I can C/P
I'm not much given to this talk about rumors and such but here I am telling you what has come ...
On the one hand. Americans have partially hacked new ROM240 and 241. At perish the 240 and 241 share the same ROM but not the Eeprom .
It has agreed to Eeprom areas of both reading and writing. This glitch has not been used if not a common bug in many visas Nagra.
This is a bug located in the cmd $ 2A $ 2B that allows a fairly complex process control IO data buffer which are then uploaded and executed in RAM.
DUMP allow controlled and writing in specific areas of Eeprom .
The Portuguese are also open ROM142 by this method.
The Spanish ROM180 are another story and although some areas have gained a bit Eeprom and ROM **** LCase remain open for now.
The reason was not published anything about it and the information is private is because it has not obtained enough at least to some code that can begin to emulate that's where the business. For the public part of the reason MOSC is the same (the code) but in this case esque Unlooper not need a profit and they have so little because the code would be very vulnerable to attack by the supplier can not control or ourselves what we write for the MOSC is effective and safe.
So far has not been emulated by any ecm soft N3 (MECM) and for the 142 or the 24x.
In the case of the 180 the emu is near impossible due to the layer Javacard and crypto routines. Asique may never leave the fly as the business comes in emus and most of those working on finding a solution do so for economic reasons. BUT NOT ALL.
However if it is true that there are already some 240 and 421 in cir **** s U.S. private function. Similarly the had have walked the same way the 142 ...
On the subject of the V10 share almost all of the code of ROM 180 and I dare say that as happened to share the RSA 110/V9 and IK.
In the case of the V10 lacks cmd $ 2A and 2B thus do not have this bug, but it is investigating a possible bug in pickling (remove the headers SECA) of C1 3C combining some 3C with 40 to cause the fault injection for soft in the process of checking signatures and apparently allows me RMOSC but this has been confirmed and a personal note, it seems a baseless canard ...
The rest is well grounded.
lit bil
I'm not much given to this talk about rumors and such but here I am telling you what has come ...
On the one hand. Americans have partially hacked new ROM240 and 241. At perish the 240 and 241 share the same ROM but not the Eeprom .
It has agreed to Eeprom areas of both reading and writing. This glitch has not been used if not a common bug in many visas Nagra.
This is a bug located in the cmd $ 2A $ 2B that allows a fairly complex process control IO data buffer which are then uploaded and executed in RAM.
DUMP allow controlled and writing in specific areas of Eeprom .
The Portuguese are also open ROM142 by this method.
The Spanish ROM180 are another story and although some areas have gained a bit Eeprom and ROM **** LCase remain open for now.
The reason was not published anything about it and the information is private is because it has not obtained enough at least to some code that can begin to emulate that's where the business. For the public part of the reason MOSC is the same (the code) but in this case esque Unlooper not need a profit and they have so little because the code would be very vulnerable to attack by the supplier can not control or ourselves what we write for the MOSC is effective and safe.
So far has not been emulated by any ecm soft N3 (MECM) and for the 142 or the 24x.
In the case of the 180 the emu is near impossible due to the layer Javacard and crypto routines. Asique may never leave the fly as the business comes in emus and most of those working on finding a solution do so for economic reasons. BUT NOT ALL.
However if it is true that there are already some 240 and 421 in cir **** s U.S. private function. Similarly the had have walked the same way the 142 ...
On the subject of the V10 share almost all of the code of ROM 180 and I dare say that as happened to share the RSA 110/V9 and IK.
In the case of the V10 lacks cmd $ 2A and 2B thus do not have this bug, but it is investigating a possible bug in pickling (remove the headers SECA) of C1 3C combining some 3C with 40 to cause the fault injection for soft in the process of checking signatures and apparently allows me RMOSC but this has been confirmed and a personal note, it seems a baseless canard ...
The rest is well grounded.
lit bil
